Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/348
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSabela, Thandeka Primrose.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMasuku, Mandla Mfundo.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T08:21:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-19T08:21:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/348-
dc.descriptionPlease note that only UMP researchers are shown in the metadata. To access the co-authors, please view the full text.en_US
dc.description.abstractSouth Africa’s higher education has undergone complex processes of state mandated institutional restructuring since the demise of apartheid. These have resulted in an increase in access to higher education and several processes of regulating the administration, organisation, management, and functioning of the country’s institutions of higher learning. The transformation of higher education in South Africa has relied on, among other factors, discourses of academisation to address historical legacies of inequity, and transform the country’s higher education curriculum. In this paper, we explore how the discourse of academisation has changed the country’s vocational programmes from being alternatives to university studies to becoming universities of technology. This change has compelled vocational programmes to shift their focus and re-curriculate thus interfering with staff composition and constrain-ing rather than creating an autonomous atmosphere for actual curriculum transformation and implementation. The country’s higher education sector needs to reflect critically on its current process of curricular transformation by interrogating if and how these transformations respond to the needs of the sector’s stakeholders, namely students and their prospective employers. This critical reflection seeks to answer questions that focus on how the curriculum strives to include its stakeholders’ narratives to help students to become socially responsive citizens, equipped with well-developed critical thinking skills. It is proposed that a participatory platform be established to which all relevant stakeholders could contribute by helping to build an effective academic agenda. This could enable the country’s higher learning institutions to be responsive to the rapidly changing needs and demands of employers by producing graduates who are both innovative and competitive critical thinkers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of KwaZulu Natalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAlternation: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Arts and Humanities in Southern Africaen_US
dc.subjectCurriculum.en_US
dc.subjectTransformation.en_US
dc.subjectAcademisation.en_US
dc.subjectResponsiveness.en_US
dc.subjectHigher education.en_US
dc.titleA reflection on academisation and its effect on curriculum transformation in South Africa’s higher education sector.en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.29086/2519-5476/2020/sp31a2-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Development Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Development Studiesen_US
dc.relation.issn2519-5476en_US
dc.description.volume27en_US
dc.description.issue31en_US
dc.description.startpage6en_US
dc.description.endpage27en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A-reflection-on-academisation-and-its-effect-on-curriculum-transformation-in-South-Africa's-higher-education-sector.pdfPublished version232.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.