Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/35
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMasuku, Mandla Mfundo.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T07:23:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-08T07:23:23Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/35-
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses poor service delivery at local government level, which is attributed to the politicisation of administrative components in municipalities, resulting in poor local governance. The public service delivery system has been perceived as one of the most important ways of reducing poverty through poverty alleviation programmes. As part of the South African government's cooperative system, key stakeholders in municipalities ought to adopt an integrated approach to public service delivery. An integrated approach to public service delivery demands that local municipalities, together with relevant stakeholders, integrate processes and services to ensure effective and efficient service delivery. This ultimately will result in an improved standard of living and sustainable livelihood for communities. With regard to public service delivery, local municipalities have the obligation of creating income opportunities people, especially the poor, with the sole aim of contributing towards poverty reduction and the realisation of the expectations of people, as stated in the South African government's White Paper of transforming public service delivery. The political interface in local municipalities greatly affects effective and efficient administration, as well as growth opportunities. Administrators, therefore, have the important function of ensuring that explicit assignments of objectives and administrative functions are wholly separated from the policy making activities of government. This paper, therefore, suggests that municipalities adopt the merit system and abandon the spoils system that is highly characterised by political favours and political interferences. Political favours and interferences are dominant in local South African government, and they hinder the process of providing services equally.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sonsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Public Affairsen_US
dc.subjectPoor service delivery.en_US
dc.subjectLocal governance.en_US
dc.subjectService delivery system.en_US
dc.subjectPolitical interferences.en_US
dc.titlePublic service delivery in South Africa : the political influence at local government level.en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pa.1935-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Development Studiesen_US
dc.relation.issne1935en_US
dc.coverage.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1935en_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage7en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypejournal article-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Development Studies-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Public-service-delivery-in-South-Africa.pdfPublished version206.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Jan 8, 2021

Download(s)

2
checked on Jan 8, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.