Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/507
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMadzivhandila, Thanyani Selby.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-22T09:41:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-22T09:41:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/507-
dc.descriptionPlease note that only UMP researchers are shown in the metadata. To access the co-authors, please view the full text.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe ownership, use and protection of traditional lands have been undermined for decades by the adverse consequence of development projects in South Africa. Especially during the post-apartheid epoch, long-lasting effects on rural livelihoods, well-being and cultures because of the expansion of development projects have been on the ascent. Sacred sites, consequently have not been spared from the wrath of destruction. This is despite that sacred sites, the knowledge and customs connected to these sites, are still vital for indigenous rural people today. They are essential for their cultural identity and livelihood. Against this background, this paper examines the ramifications of subverting and obliterating sacred sites in the façade of development. The paper uses Makwarela, Tate Vondo and Phiphidi case Studies situated in Vhembe district, South Africa to give an outline of the ramifications of subverting and obliterating sacred sites on rural livelihoods. The paper uses the qualitative method to collect data.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAdonis & Abbey Publishersen_US
dc.relationDepartment of Science and Innovation (DSI)en_US
dc.relationNational Research Foundation (NRF)en_US
dc.relationCentre of Excellence in Indigenous Knowledge Systems (CIKS)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAfrican Journal of Sociological and Psychological Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRural development.en_US
dc.subjectSacred sites.en_US
dc.subjectTraditional leaders.en_US
dc.subjectIndigenous people.en_US
dc.subjectSpiritual and religious connection.en_US
dc.subjectLivelihoods.en_US
dc.titleHarmful development projects vis-à-vis conservation of sacred sites: Makwarela, Tate Vondo and Phiphidi case studies.en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31920/2752-6585/2021/v1n1a1-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Development Studiesen_US
dc.relation.issn2752-6585en_US
dc.description.volume1en_US
dc.description.issue1en_US
dc.description.startpage7en_US
dc.description.endpage30en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20500101-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Development Studies-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Harmful-development-projects-vis-à-vis-conservation-of sacred-sites-Makwarela-Tate-Vondo-and-Phiphidi-case-studies..pdf
  Until 2050-01-01
Published version509.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.