Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/140
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNsukwini, Sakhile.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-16T07:08:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-16T07:08:05Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/140-
dc.descriptionPlease note that only UMP researchers are shown in the metadata. To access the co-authors, please view the full text.en_US
dc.description.abstractCommunities neighbouring protected areas globally suffer various costs while enjoying limited benefits from conservation areas. This study compared livelihood costs and benefits to selected neighbouring communities around the Somkhanda Game Reserve (SGR), which is a community-owned conserved area and the Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park (HiP), a state-owned, provincial park in northern KwaZulu-Natal. Quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative (focus groups and interviews with key informants) methods were used to examine the livelihood impacts of the two conservation study sites on neighbouring communities. The political ecology and the sustainable livelihood framework guided the research. The most common livelihood costs incurred in both neighbouring communities include loss of land, curtailed access to traditionally used natural resources, destruction of crops and devouring of livestock by wild animals, loss or injury of human life by wildlife and the spreading of wildlife diseases to livestock. Benefits included employment opportunities, business opportunities, access to natural resources and collection of firewood. The identified livelihood costs from the two conservation areas have further been aggravated by lack of compensation to affected households. The study recommends that measures should be taken to strengthen problem animal control in the two conservation areas. Furthermore, both conservation areas should come up with some compensation criteria to cover affected households.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEditura Universitati din Oradeaen_US
dc.subjectProtected areas.en_US
dc.subjectCommunity costs.en_US
dc.subjectConversation case study.en_US
dc.titleProtected areas, community costs and benefits : a comparative study of selected conservation case studies from Northern Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa.en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.30892/gtg.27422-441-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.issn2065-0817en_US
dc.description.volume27en_US
dc.description.issue4en_US
dc.description.startpage1377en_US
dc.description.endpage1391en_US
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Jan 8, 2021

Download(s)

2
checked on Jan 8, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.