Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/183
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMlambo, Victor.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-30T10:13:10Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-30T10:13:10Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/183-
dc.descriptionPlease note that only UMP researchers are shown in the metadata. To access the co-authors, please view the full text.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe comparative growth habits and nutritive value of native grass species of South Africa are largely unknown despite the utility of this information in rangeland restoration efforts. This article presents a comparative characterisation of the morphology, chemical composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation of Urochloa mosambicensis, Cymbopogon pospischilii, Eragrostis superba, Fingerhuthia africana and Eragrostis bicolor when grown under controlled conditions. Species were analysed for height, number of leaves, number of tillers, stem diameter and leaf width at different growth stages, whereas chemical composition and in vitro ruminal dry matter degradability (DMD) were assessed at maturity stage. Grass species and growth stages significantly influenced morphological characteristics. Eragrostis superba and U. mosambicensis had the highest number of leaves at the reproductive stage. Urochloa mosambicensis ranked highest in terms of rangeland restoration potential when all morphological parameters were considered, followed by E. superba and C. pospischilii. With the highest crude protein, low acid-detergent lignin and higher DMD at 48 h, F. africana and C. pospischilii have the highest potential feed value. Across the three most suitable native grass species, U. mosambicensis, E. superba and C. pospischilii, there is sufficient genetic diversity that suggests that these plants may play different and complementary ecological roles in the communal rangeland ecosystem.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectCommunal areas.en_US
dc.subjectEcological niche.en_US
dc.subjectMorphology.en_US
dc.subjectRestoration.en_US
dc.subjectSemi-arid.en_US
dc.titleA comparative analysis of the morphology and nutritive value of five South African native grass species grown under controlled conditions.en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2989/10220119.2018.1516236-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Agricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.issn1022-0119en_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage4en_US
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Agricultural Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

118
checked on Jun 8, 2021

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 8, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.