Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/269
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorParker, Daniel M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T06:12:25Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-08T06:12:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/269-
dc.descriptionPlease note that only UMP researchers are shown in the metadata. To access the co-authors, please view the full text.en_US
dc.description.abstractTrophic cascade theories such as the ‘behaviourally-mediated trophic cascade hypothesis’ (BMTCH), have mainstreamed as ecological tools for conserving biodiversity and restoring ecosystems. The BMTCH relies on indirect negative effects of large carnivores through suppression of mesocarnivore activity and habitat use. Importantly, effects of top carnivores on mesocarnivores varies over time and space, is dependent on the species involved, and local context. In South Africa, there are very few free-ranging carnivores, as populations are often restricted to enclosed reserves. While predator-proof fences reduce human-wildlife conflict, they also influence space use within communities. We used an enclosed reserve with a relatively full complement of carnivores to test the generality of the BMTCH in the African context. Using single-species, multi-season occupancy models we investigated the spatial dynamics of multiple carnivores. We also investigated spatial partitioning by vegetation type and temporal partitioning. Our results revealed both support for and against the BMTCH. Lions and spotted hyaenas negatively influenced the detection probability of black-backed jackals and African wildcats, while leopards had a positive effect on these two mesocarnivore species. Additionally, lions positively influenced the detection probability of side-striped jackals. Although space use of carnivores in relation to vegetation type showed minimal evidence of spatial partitioning, each carnivore had a unique combination of abiotic and biotic factors influencing their spatial dynamics, which could facilitate co-existence. Temporal partitioning may also be promoting co-existence as activity patterns of smaller carnivores overlapped the least with sympatric carnivores, particularly lions. Extensive activity overlap between large carnivores does not promote co-existence. We suggest that applying the BMTCH as a universal law across ecosystems is unsupported and may lead to inappropriate conservation and management actions, and prevent protection of ecosystems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal for Nature Conservationen_US
dc.subjectTrophic cascades.en_US
dc.subjectCamera trapping.en_US
dc.subjectEnclosed reserve.en_US
dc.subjectMesocarnivore release.en_US
dc.subjectSpatial dynamics.en_US
dc.titleLions do not change rivers: complex African savannas preclude top-down forcing by large carnivores.en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125844-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.issn1617-1381en_US
dc.description.volume56en_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage9en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20501231-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lions-do-not-change-rivers-complex-African-savannas-preclude-top-down-forcing-by-large-predators.pdf
  Until 2050-12-31
Published version667.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Jun 8, 2021

Download(s)

2
checked on Jun 8, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.