Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/341
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCawthorn, Donna-Maree.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T08:13:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-18T08:13:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/341-
dc.descriptionPlease note that only UMP researchers are shown in the metadata. To access the co-authors, please view the full text.en_US
dc.description.abstractSeafood mislabelling is a global issue that affects consumers, target species, and the ability to manage fisheries. Due to their high demand and value, groupers (Epinephelinae spp.) are frequent targets for fraudulent substitution on the world's major seafood markets. Yet, little is known on the prevalence of grouper mislabelling in the Wider Caribbean Region. We conducted the first ‘grouper’ authentication survey in the Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI), a luxury tourist destination where the locally caught but critically endangered Nassau grouper (Epinephelus striatus) features prominently on menus. DNA barcoding was used to assess mislabelling of market samples and simultaneously to gauge compliance with the Nassau grouper closed season. Our genetic analyses did not detect banned Nassau grouper, but only 18% of samples from restaurants and stores were confirmed as Epinephelinae (i.e. groupers), and 96% were mislabelled in some way. Substitutes for grouper mostly comprised freshwater catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus; 57% of samples) and snappers (Lutjanidae; 25%), whereas samples sold as ‘local grouper’ were from Indo-Pacific or Asian inland waters. Only 22% of samples were matched to species found locally, all being cubera snapper (Lutjanus cyanopterus). Our study suggests that (i) mislabelling is motivated predominantly by financial incentives and/or driven by low supplies of groupers, (ii) local fishers are not the main source of mislabelled grouper into the supply chain, and (iii) the primary victims are consumers, fishing communities, and ultimately fragile fish stocks. Our findings can be used to help improve transparency, traceability and accountability in local seafood supply chains.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relationResearch and Innovation Programmeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Conservationen_US
dc.subjectDNA barcoding.en_US
dc.subjectFisheries.en_US
dc.subjectGrouper.en_US
dc.subjectSeafood substitution.en_US
dc.subjectTraceability.en_US
dc.subjectTurks and Caicos Islands.en_US
dc.titleGlobal footprint of mislabelled seafood on a small island nation.en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108557-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.issn0006-3207en_US
dc.description.volume245en_US
dc.description.issue2020en_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage9en_US
dc.relation.grantno701737en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypejournal article-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Global-footprint-of-mislabelled-seafood-on-a-small-island-nation.pdfPublished version1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Jun 8, 2021

Download(s)

2
checked on Jun 8, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.