Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/972
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCuthbert, Ross N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNkosi, Masimini Stanford.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDalu, Tatenda.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-15T09:10:50Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-15T09:10:50Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/972-
dc.descriptionPublished versionen_US
dc.description.abstractMicroplastics are widespread pollutants, but few studies have linked field prevalence in organisms to laboratory uptakes. Aquatic filter feeders may be particularly susceptible to microplastic uptake, with the potential for trophic transfer to higher levels, including humans. Here, we surveyed microplastics from a model freshwater shrimp, common caraidina (Caridina nilotica) inhabiting the Crocodile River in South Africa to better understand microplastic uptake rates per individual. We then use functional response analysis (feeding rate as a function of resource density) to quantify uptake rates by shrimps in the laboratory. We found that microplastics were widespread in C. nilotica, with no significant differences in microplastic abundances among sampled sites under varying land uses, with an average abundance of 6.2 particles per individual. The vast majority of microplastics found was fibres (86.1%). Shrimp microplastic accumulation patterns were slightly higher in the laboratory than the field, where shrimp exhibited a hyperbolic Type II functional response model under varying exposure concentrations. Maximum feeding rates of 20 particles were found over a 6 h feeding period, and uptake evidenced at even the lowest laboratory concentrations (~10 particles per mL). These results highlight that microplastic uptake is widespread in field populations and partly density dependent, with field concentrations corroborating uptake rates recorded in the laboratory. Further research is required to elucidate trophic transfer from these taxa and to understand potential physiological impacts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectAquatic ecosystem.en_US
dc.subjectCaridina nilotica.en_US
dc.subjectFunctional response.en_US
dc.subjectMaximum feeding rate.en_US
dc.subjectPollution.en_US
dc.subjectSouth Africa.en_US
dc.titleField and laboratory microplastics uptake by a freshwater shrimp.en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.11198-
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen's University Belfasten_US
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage7en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptQueen's University Belfast-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Field-and-laboratory-microplastics-update-by-a-freshwater-shrimp..pdfpublished version724.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.