Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Building assessment practice and lessons from the scientific assessment on livestock predation in South Africa.||Authors:||Minnie, Liaan.
School of Biology and Environmental Sciences
|Keywords:||Evidence-based policy.;Adaptive management.;Transdisciplinary.;Livestock.;Predation.||Issue Date:||2019||Publisher:||Crossmark||Abstract:||After at least two millennia of human–wildlife conflict over the predation of livestock in South Africa, the recently completed scientific assessment on livestock predation (PredSA) brings the power of a formal scientific assessment to focus on the topic. PredSA represents a global first in terms of applying this increasingly recognised approach to informing policy to the issue of livestock predation at a national level. Here we explore the process behind the assessment, its structure and policy relevance, and some lessons learnt and suggest some avenues for the way forward. Scientific assessments are a relatively recent societal tool. Operating at the science–policy interface, they serve to collate and interrogate transdisciplinary information relating to a complex problem and, through consensus, evaluate the relevance of the findings to policy development. Having emerged over the past three decades, there is a growing body of best practice guiding the basis for scientific assessments and how these should be conducted. Briefly, an assessment should have demonstrable legitimacy (a valid issue requiring attention at the behest of a relevant authority), saliency (the focus on stakeholders’ interests in the problem) and credibility (reflecting scientific rigour by recognised experts) to be accepted by, and useful to, society. To achieve these criteria, the governance of an assessment process needs to be transparent and demonstrate a commitment to being broadly participatory. The need for an assessment on livestock predation in South Africa was identified by the national Departments of Environmental Affairs (DEA) and Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF), as well as the livestock industry. Discussions around this need developed through the Predation Management Forum, the latter representing the wool, mohair, red meat and wildlife industries, as well as the regulatory bodies. Financial support was provided by DEA and DAFF as well as the National Wool Growers Association, Mohair Growers Association and the Red Meat Producers Organisation. This support reflects the legitimacy of the assessment, emerging as it does from both the policy/regulatory domain and stakeholders directly affected by predation on livestock. The Minister of Environmental Affairs and the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries formally endorsed PredSA at its launch in 2016. The route to the assessment launch, however, started in 2010 with dialogue between the abovementioned role players and the Centre for African Conservation Ecology (ACE) at Nelson Mandela University. This dialogue, facilitated by seed funding from Woolworths SA, resulted in a proposal for the assessment to be hosted by ACE, which engaged recognised experts nationwide and followed the transdisciplinary approach of the 2008 Elephant Management Assessment.||URI:||https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/101||DOI:||10.17159/sajs.2019/5766|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Building-assessment-practice-and-lessons-from-the-scientific-assessment-on-livestock-predation-in-South-Africa.pdf||Published version||167.27 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
checked on Jan 8, 2021
checked on Jan 8, 2021
Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.